As is my wont, I’ve decided to put a somewhat historical cast on the whole hullabaloo, and I ask myself what, in their titanic wisdom, would the great scientists of yesteryear do? Though sundry historians may disagree, there is perhaps some merit in gleaning from history examples we may follow—from the past, lessons for the present. I am driven, half by intellectual curiosity and half by sheer perversity, to consider the merits of “Going Galton.”
As you may (but probably do not) know,*** Francis Galton was a cousin of Charles Darwin and one of the forebears of modern anthropology. He introduced the use of statistics into the field, developing the analytical technique of regression to the mean.**** Now, if you know any anthropologists (or, heaven forfend, are one yourself), you’ll know that anthropologists, as a rule, have enough chips on their shoulders to put Toll House out of business. Yes, I’ll be the first to admit that we folks who don’t spend our time compiling type indexes and acquiring cultural competency in the commodification of mimetic indigenous kin-group ritual/rite-patterns have some unsavory stereotypes of those who do.
But listen up, filthy acolytes of Malinowski: you should count your lucky shamanistic fetishes that the best we can come up with is the fact that your work is entirely without merit.***** Just be glad that Galton didn’t leave an even bigger, creepier stain on your discipline’s bed sheets. This man's many hobbies include using anthropometrics to explain why the white race was superior to all others and creating a "beauty map" of England, showing where there were statistically significant concentrations of foxy ladies.****** I kid you not.
So what might it mean to Go Galton in this recession? The ultimate goal, of course, would to make some sort of statement about President Obama’s economic policy and even legislative change. Ideally, that statement should be as obstreperous as possible and wreak a degree of havoc on the hearts and minds of the hogs who cluster greedily around the trunk of your intellectual tree, growing fat off of your creative windfall. So, we ask again the question, asked by the most discerning of racist bigot douchebags for generations: What Would Galton Do?
Galton's travels in Africa can give us some insight into how the great Asshole of Anthropometrics would proceed. As M.G. Bulmer writes in a curiously laudatory biography:
“One problem had to be resolved before Galton could travel north into the land of the Damaras. The local Hottentot tribes under the above-mentioned Jonker were in constant conflict with the Damaras and wanted to prevent white men from traveling into Damaraland. Galton tried to negotiate with Jonker with little success and finally decided to intimidate him. He rode into Jonker’s village, dressed in hunting pink (red hunting-coat, jackboots, and hunting cap) and mounted on his favorite ox, Ceylon (the horses had all died of distemper), leaped a brook, trotted into Jonker’s hut, and berated him. Jonker was suitably impressed, and he and the other chiefs later agreed to make peace with the Damaras so that it would be safe for white men to pass through their territory. They also agreed to abide by a simple code of law drawn up by Galton.”*******Wow. Not only did he intimidate the chief into granting him safe-passage by charging a pack-animal into his living room and manage to negotiate a peace treaty between the two perpetually-warring tribes, but this Moses of the Muskox also brought enlightened European law to the benighted savages? Why hasn't anyone tried this yet? It would certainly be much more effective than impotently threatening to withdraw your creative efforts from society because you're being punished for being successful.
(Oh, and if you're worried about any racist undertones associated with comparing Obama to an African chieftain, just remember: it's mostly Republicans who are into this whole Galt thing. Do you think that the party of "Barack The Magic Negro" and "Obama Bucks" is really going to have a problem with that?)
To close, here is a sketch of Ceylon in Galton's own hand:
The caption states, as best as I can tell, "Ceylon ---- the best back in Africa." I'm probably just not racist enough to understand what must have been some kind of hilarious bon mot to Galton & Co. But, to be fair, I'm sure Ceylon did have a very strong back. After all, it must be hard work bearing the white man and his burden.
Footnotes
*Only two sorts of things may be properly “abuzz:” a hive of bees and the blogosphere. Perhaps it has something to do with the senseless repetition of inanity by hordes of mindless drones. This naturally raises comparisons between hyperlinks and the waggle dance, which subsequently evokes the image of a crowd gathered around Warren Ellis shaking his derriere and dancing in a figure-eight to demonstrate exactly how far and in which direction one must fly in order to find a picture of a man with his penis in a vice.
**Avec la circonflexe et l’aigu, bien sur. In the Francophone world, “mêlée” denotes both hand-to-hand and ranged combat, as, in a pinch, the accents may be used as a boomerang and a dart, respectively. Once used, however, the fight devolves into the much more English melee, which just involves lots of punching and the occasional broken bottle.
***Look, no offense. It’s just that in all likelihood, you have never heard of this guy. If you have, I probably know what you look like when you sleep. Yes, even you. Especially you.
****Yeah, I don’t know what that shit means either. I may be pre-med, but I’m a recidivist humanist, not a fallen mathematician. It’s a miracle I can even type the words “regression to the mean” without foaming at the mouth and falling into a brief catatonia.
*****Lucky you! You don’t have to go anywhere to Go Galt—you’re already there, you majestic Randian übermensch, you!
******He was also known to measure the proportions of women he found attractive from afar, using a sextant, presumably sighting off of Polaris and their cleavage.
*******Bulmer, M. G. Francis Galton: pioneer of heredity and biometry. 2003. Johns Hopkins University Press.
No comments:
Post a Comment